Trump vs Strzok vs Solomon: Bigger Felony
DOJ (The U.S. Department of Justice) won't back Trump's absolute immunity claim against civil lawsuits seeking to hold him liable for the Jan. 6 attack -- allegations of inciting violence, wouldn't fall within presidential duties, US says. Alluding to the elephant in the room: " the United States does not express any view regarding the potential criminal liability of any person for the events of January 6, 2021, or acts connected with those events." Trump can be sued by police over Jan. 6 riot, Justice Department says.
Conservatives and Trump - MAGA World nearly got exactly what they wanted: an FBI terrified to do its own job when conservatives appear to have broken the law. After he left office, Trump ordered his Chief of Staff to leak classified information to the press about an FBI agent and other adversaries. May be a felony. Trump may now face even greater legal jeopardy than previously known (about classified document in Mar-a-Lago). The FBI, traumatized from the Trump era assaults on it, treated Trump with kid gloves. FBI agents and DOJ prosecutors argued over raid of Trump's Mar-a-Lago.
Special Counsel investigators recently interviewed a Trump aide about how a box with classified materials ended up at Mar-a-Lago months after FBI's initial search & why the aide had previously scanned classified materials, onto a laptop.
"Biden must FIRE FBI Director Christopher Wray.” A federal judge has *granted* an effort by ex-FBI officials Pete Strzok and Lisa Page to depose Trump and Chris Wray for two hours each. Federal prosecutors have asked the chief judge in Washington, D.C.’s federal court to compel former Vice President Mike Pence to comply with a grand jury subpoena and testify as a witness in Special Counsel Jack Smith’s investigation. Per 3 people familiar with the investigation, the motion to compel Pence’s testimony – filed in secret to Chief Judge Beryl Howell in recent days – came after lawyers for former President Donald Trump asserted executive privilege in response to Pence’s subpoena. The motion to compel filed by the special counsel's office is the logical next step in a criminal probe, with prosecutors seeking force a witness or third party to comply with a grand jury subpoena. It asks the court to uphold the subpoena’s legal authority. 2 people familiar say the chief judge has also made a common move during a grand-jury investigation: issuing a court instruction for secrecy, or "gag order," in recent days. That means all those involved with the probe in any capacity cannot comment on it.
"The Senate must conduct hearings into Fox News. "His DC Office went rogue; its chief tried to thwart the Trump Documents Investigation. Schumer sent Murdoch a LETTER? Send him some subpoenas."
"Tucker Carlson promises Kevin McCarthy he won't mis-use the 1/6 Video. "As Dominion proves, Tucker's word is the coin of the realm. Provided the realm in question is Russia. A series of texts involving FOX network personalities require Democrats to rethink their approach to information warfare. Per the filing, on November 8, 2020, Rupert Murdoch met with Lachlan and Fox News CEO Suzanne Scott about the "mounting viewer backlash to Fox," and embarked on a strategy that involved platforming election liars. Rupert Murdoch gave Trump son-in-law/aide Jared Kushner access to "Fox confidential information about Biden's ads," apparently showing them to him before they were public.
Ron DeSantis says that the next president should “reconstitutionalize government” at the federal level by firing career civil servants, which the Trump Admin failed to do. He says although they will challenge it in court, he thinks they will win in the Supreme Court.
Months after he had left office, former president Donald Trump, directed his former chief-of-staff, Mark Meadows to leak highly classified government records regarding Peter Strzok, the former Deputy Assistant Director of the FBI’s Counterintelligence Division, to the press. In the final days of Trump’s presidency, Meadows had removed the classified files from the White House, which Trump and Meadows believed would discredit Strzok.
The explosive ramifications of such a knowing and willful leak of classified information by Trump, or by someone on his behalf, at his direction, after he left office, is that Trump would have potentially committed a felony.
As president, Trump enjoyed a virtually absolute and unfettered constitutional authority to declassify virtually almost any government secrets he so wished. But once gone from office, Trump no longer had any legal authority or power beyond that of an ordinary citizen to declassify government papers or; much less leak classified records. Any provision of classified information at that time would be a crime.
Brad Moss, an attorney specializing in national security law, explained to me: “Anything Trump had in his possession that was still classified and that he gave to a reporter or anyone else unauthorized to receive it, after 12:01 pm on January 21, 2021, was unlawful as a legal matter.”
Richard Immerman, an Assistant Deputy Director of National Intelligence during the George W. Bush administration told me: “Once a president’s tenure in office has ended, he or she has no authority to declassify documents. If he does, he’s breaking the law.”
This new issue arises just as special counsel Jack Smith is already conducting a federal criminal investigation to determine whether Trump broke the law by taking hundreds of pages of other classified papers from the White House to his home in Mar-a-Largo when his presidency was over. The Justice Department has also previously alleged in federal court that Trump “likely concealed and removed” classified documents from one place he was keeping them, to another less likely place where they would be found by federal prosecutors and the FBI, with a purpose to “obstruct” their investigation. Smith has also taken charge of the investigation of whether Trump obstructed justice.
Jack Smith has questioned a small number of witnesses about Trump’s and Meadows’ mishandling of classified documents related to the FBI’s Russia investigation. But the issue does not appear, at least for now, to be a major focus for the special counsel.
The plan to leak classified and derogatory information to Trump about Strzok was described to me by at least three sources, including two of Trump’s former presidential aides, and a colleague of right -wing journalist John Solomon, to whom Trump had already leaked several other several classified documents to in the final hours of his presidency to help Trump in the hopes of discrediting perceived enemies; in this case, the leaders and agents of the FBI who conducted that agency’s investigation of Russia’s covert efforts to help elect him as president in 2016.
A former Trump administration official, in arguing that Meadows had the right to remove a portion of the Russia papers from the White House, and leak them to reporters, once out of office, asserted that they were justified to do so, citing a presidential order signed by Trump, on Jan. 19, 2021, the last full day of Trump’s presidency. Trump said in the order that the Russia papers were to “be declassified to the maximum extent possible.”
However, on the very next day, Jan 20, just prior to Joe Biden taking his oath of office, Meadows wrote a memo clarifying Trump’s order to explain that although Trump had already “declassified certain materials related to the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Crossfire Hurricane [Russia} investigation,” none of them would be released anytime soon due to objections from the Justice Department and other agencies, who had yet been able to undertake a “privacy act review, under the standards that the Department of Justice would normally apply, redact material approximately, and release the remaining material with redactions applied.”
Trump’s and Meadow’s actions did not legally declassify the Russia papers, that they remained classified, and that then disclosing their contents once out of office, would almost certainly constitute criminal behavior.
Immerman, the former Assistant Deputy Director of Intelligence from 2007 to 2009, is also a retired historian of U.S. foreign relations and intelligence who has taught at the Army War College and Temple University. For a decade he chaired the State Department’s Historic Advisory Committee. He has had decades of practical experience navigating government secrecy and classification issues.
Meadows will defend himself and Trump against any allegation that either man broke the law, by leaking any of the Russia papers or Strzok documents, by arguing that those records were properly declassified. Extraordinarily, Meadows himself has expressed the exact opposite view--- in his memoirs.
On Jan. 20, 2021, as Joe Biden was about to be sworn in as president, Meadows raced to the White House, “because he had several documents to pick up, and only two hours to do it,” Meadows wrote in his recent memoir, “The Chief’s Chief.” Meadows further explained: “For weeks, we had been trying to declassify several key papers that would unravel the full story of how the United States intelligence community had targeted President Trump, spied on his campaign, and attempted to bring him down—which by the way is the only ‘coup’ that ever occurred during President Trump’s years in the White House.”
Meadows added: “The president had declassified some documents before I became Chief of Staff, but several key documents remained classified despite his direct orders to declassify a list of relevant notes, memos and emails [emphasis added].”
***
Another authoritative source of corroborating information that Trump attempted to leak classified information on. Strzok to the press is New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman.
In her recent book on Trump, “Confidence Man: The Making of Donald Trump and the Breaking of America,”, Haberman made a passing reference – all of two sentences and in the book’s epilogue – reporting that Trump casually divulged to her months after she left office that Meadows had taken the previously undisclosed and still classified and transcribed Strzok texts with him when he left the White House, and Trump could arrange for Meadows to provide copies to her.
Haberman wrote: “We learned the night before Biden’s inauguration that Trump was planning to make them public. He ultimately didn’t, but he told me that Meadows had that material in his possession and offered to connect me with him.”
What Trump told Haberman by itself had the potential to be a bombshell, but Trump’s comments to her, went largely unnoticed; not the least of which was by Haberman herself. Haberman may not have fully understood in the moment or subsequently contextualized the importance of Trump’s comments to her:
Trump in essence was proposing that his former chief of staff, at his direction, leak classified information to Haberman, during a time such a leak would have been illegal, because Trump was no longer president.
Trump provided right wing journalist, John Solomon, access to a nearly thousand-page trove of classified records, known among Trump and his closest aides, as the Russia papers. Three sources confirmed to me that derogatory information about Strzok was included in the Russia papers, and this was among the information which Trump and Meadows aspired to leak to Haberman, Solomon, and others.
The eve of Biden’s inauguration and just one hour after Trump signed his presidential order declassifying the Russian papers a relatively small portion of the records were then turned over to Solomon. Solomon published a story that night (and a second one the following week), based on the records Trump had provided him.
“I don’t know who those are from,” Solomon says Meadows told him. As a result, Solomon said, Meadows decided to “pull back” and not send him the rest of the Russia papers. The following morning, as Biden was about to be sworn in, Meadows wrote his own supplementary memo, clarifying Trump’s declassification order, and delaying release of the Russia papers until the Justice Department and other agencies could fully weigh in.
Two weeks after Trump left office, Solomon wrote a column inferring that he had just obtained more than a thousand additional pages of the classified Russia papers.
On Feb. 5, 2021, Solomon wrote on his website: “More than two weeks after Donald Trump officially declassified the evidence, the vast majority of documents detailing FBI and Justice Department failures in the now-discredited Russia collusion investigation remain out of public view in a delay that has thwarted the former president's goal of sweeping transparency.”
Solomon further wrote: “Just the News was able to obtain about 15% of the thousands of pages of declassified documents, from a hodgepodge network of White House officials who worked on the declassification, law enforcement and intelligence officials who got their own versions of the declassified documents, and members of Congress who were given copies of some memos in the final days of the Trump presidency.”
Solomon’s claims were disingenuous: At least some of Russia papers Solomon claimed he now had in his possession were classified, not declassified. By Solomon’s own admission, Trump and Meadows allowed him twice on Jan. 19, 2021 to have full access to the Russia papers in the White House, a much more likely source for a portion of the leak of classified documents he was newly claiming to be in his physical possession.
Solomon identified one source of this new leak of the Russia papers as “White House officials who worked on the declassification.” But in his memoirs, Mark Meadows wrote that he, not subordinates at the White House, personally handled the so-called declassification of the Russia papers. In the “final weeks” of Trump’s presidency, Meadows wrote, “he personally went through every page” of the Russia papers “to make sure that the president’s declassification would not inadvertently disclose sources of methods,” Even if another White House official who worked on the declassification” leaked the papers to Solomon, instead of Meadows himself, it is unlikely that they did so without Meadows’ approval and perhaps Trump’s as well, given that this purported leaker worked for Meadows, that Meadows oversaw the “declassification effort” on behalf of Trump, and that Trump had already twice personally allowed Solomon access to the papers.
Perhaps most importantly is the timing of Solomon’s having received the 1,000-page tranche of classified Russia papers. Solomon infers that to have happened only recently, just before he wrote his column, and after Trump’s term in office was over. If true, and Trump or Meadows provided the records to Solomon, or that they directed or conspired with others to do so, that would implicate one or both men in the commission of a potential felony.
Solomon himself has described other papers on Russia provided to him quite differently. He was twice given access by the president of the United States to an archive of classified papers on the FBI’s Russia investigation— “thousands of pages” — which Solomon has compared to the Pentagon Papers: “These [Russian papers] are to judicial integrity what the Pentagon Papers were to the Vietnam War,” Solomon said on Fox News in January of 2021. Regarding some of the documents he characterized in his article as declassified while brandishing his access to it, a former White House official said that several of the documents to which Solomon was referring were declassified by people not authorized to do so. Thus, they remained classified and likely illegal for most government officials to leak them to Solomon. Additionally, Solomon had published a story a full week after Trump left the presidency, based on highly classified documents on Christopher Steele. Solomon has told me that they were provided to him by an unnamed Justice Department official at the direction of Donald Trump and Mark Meadows. Solomon asserted that he received the document on Jan. 19, 2021, the last evening of Trump’s presidency, when it was still legal for Trump to release them. The claim that Trump and Meadows did not provide him those documents after Jan 20, when it would have been illegal for either one or both of them, to provide them to Solomon, is as of now based solely on Solomon’s word and nothing more.
Although the documents leaked to Solomon were not about Strzok personally, Trump and Solomon persisted in their belief that they would more broadly discredit the FBI’s investigation of the Russian Federation’s Active Measures campaign to interfere with the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign, by helping to elect Trump and defeating Hillary Clinton. Strzok had played both a supervisory and investigative role in the investigation, codenamed “Crossfire Hurricane.” The classified material which Trump provided to Solomon was meant to discredit by name two specific FBI informants providing intelligence to Strzok and other investigators on the case. In doing so, they indirectly attacked Strzok and they also damaged the ability of Strzok and the other FBI agents working the case to further conduct counter-intelligence and criminal investigations by compromising sources and methods.
If Trump was truthful and accurate in his comments, in what he said to his own aides, Maggie Haberman, and at least one other person, the significance of such to his presidency cannot be overstated.
First, any such leak of classified information by Trump or anyone at Trump’s direction, after Trump had left office, was a potential crime.
Second, if what Trump told Haberman and others was correct when he asserted that Meadows removed presidential records—especially ones that remained classified—from the White House upon leaving office, Meadows too may have violated federal law.
Third, if Trump and Meadows coordinated or worked together to leak classified material on Strzok to the press, that might lead a reasonable prosecutor to open an investigation as to whether they conspired to break the law.
Paul Pelletier, a former Acting Chief of the Justice Department's Criminal Division's Fraud Section, told me, “Any agreement between two or more people to violate federal law is itself a violation of the federal conspiracy statute. It’s that simple.”
Although it is unclear what the previously undisclosed tranche of Strzok texts taken by Meadows from the White House would show, dozens of messages between Strzok and Lisa Page, a senior FBI attorney, were previously made public. Strzok and Page were in the midst of an extramarital affair against the backdrop of Strzok’s leading role in the Russia investigation. The text messages released by the Justice Department at the behest of then-Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and Trump’s congressional Republican allies were salacious. Many of those messages showed the two making disparaging comments about Trump, although less attention was paid to the fact that they also often severely criticized both Democratic and Republican political candidates and officeholders.
Trump and his surrogates have long claimed that the political opinions expressed by Strzok and Page demonstrated evidence of a vast conspiracy that the Justice Department and FBI had conducted their Russia election influence probe for the purpose of preventing Trump’s election, or failing that, once Trump was elected president, to drive him from office. There is little doubt that Strzok’s and Page’s use of their work email for such purposes harmed the FBI’s reputation for institutional non-partisanship. The Justice Department’s Inspector General has said he was “deeply troubled” by Strzok’s texts. But a thorough and exhaustive investigative by that very same Inspector General found no evidence that Trump’s charges of political bias by the FBI in the conduct of its Russia inquiry. Nor did the Inspector General find any evidence to support Trump’s conspiracy theories that the investigation was undertaken to prevent Trump’s election as president or drive him from office as a contingency. Despite numerous other investigations by Republican allies of the former president in Congress, no credible evidence has ever surfaced to lend credence to those same allegations.
Before Donald Trump named Mark Meadows his presidential chief of staff, Meadows was a Republican member of Congress and a founding member, and later, chairman of the House Freedom Caucus. As the ranking Republican on the House Oversight Committee, few members of Congress were as zealous in their pursuit of proving conspiracy theories that an amorphous Deep State, the Justice Department, and FBI were abusing their power to destroy Donald Trump.
To achieve those ends, no member of Congress so zealously pursued Peter Strzok. In instance after instance, the allegations that Meadows has leveled against Strzok and Lisa Page have been debunked or proven to be baseless.
For example, Meadows lodged an accusation against Page and Strzok, alleging that one or both had leaked information from the Russia investigation to harm Trump. The evidence: an email exchange between Strzok and Page to discuss the topic of a “Media Leak Strategy.”
Then President Trump tweeted: “New Strzok-Page texts reveal “Media Leak Strategy.”@FoxNews So terrible, and NOTHING is being done at DOJ or FBI - but the world is watching, and they get it completely.”
However, as the disclosure of other emails and evidence would show, there was a much more mundane explanation. As a result of Strzok’s own past success in tracking down and prosecuting leakers, he now sat on an ad hoc working group tasked with preventing leaks of classified information—a top priority of Donald Trump and Mark Meadows during the Trump presidency.
——
-prada- (Adi Mulia Pradana) is a Helper. Former adviser (President Indonesia) Jokowi for mapping 2-times election. I used to get paid to catch all these blunders—now I do it for free. Trying to work out what's going on, what happens next. Arch enemies of the tobacco industry, (still) survive after getting doxed.
(Very rare compliment and initiative pledge. Thank you. Yes, even a lot of people associated me PRAVDA, not part of MIUCCIA PRADA. I’m literally asshole on debate, since in college). Especially tonight heated between Putin and Prigozhin.
========
Thanks for reading Prada’s Newsletter. I was lured, inspired by someone writer, his post in LinkedIn months ago, “Currently after a routine daily writing newsletter in the last 10 years, my subscriber reaches 100,000. Maybe one of my subscribers is your boss.” After I get followed / subscribed by (literally) prominent AI and prominent Chief Product and Technology of mammoth global media (both: Sir, thank you so much), I try crafting more / better writing.
To get the ones who really appreciate your writing, and now prominent people appreciate my writing, priceless feeling. Prada ungated/no paywall every notes-but thank you for anyone open initiative pledge to me.
(Promoting to more engage in Substack) Seamless to listen to your favorite podcasts on Substack. You can buy a better headset to listen to a podcast here (GST DE352306207). Listeners on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Overcast, or Pocket Casts simultaneously. podcasting can transform more of a conversation. Invite listeners to weigh in on episodes directly with you and with each other through discussion threads. At Substack, the process is to build with writers. Podcasts are an amazing feature of the Substack. I wish it had a feature to read the words we have written down without us having to do the speaking. Thanks for reading Prada’s Newsletter.